Jo Sidhu KC accused of inappropriate behaviour made resort room incident ‘so regular’, bar tribunal hears


A younger aspiring lawyer who took her mini-pupillage underneath former Legal Bar Affiliation chair Jo Sidhu KC mentioned she ‘didn’t need sexual exercise’ with the silk however felt unable to go away his resort room, a tribunal heard right now.

Sidhu faces 15 misconduct prices, all of which he denies, relating to 3 ladies who had been both legislation college students or present process mini-pupillage on the time of the alleged misconduct.

Individual 2, who was a paralegal on the time, was provided a private mini-pupillage with Sidhu in 2018. She informed the tribunal it was her first and solely mini-pupillage and he or she was unaware of the variations between knowledgeable and private mini-pupillage.

Jo Sidhu

Throughout cross examination Alisdair Williamson KC, for Sidhu, mentioned: ‘In your witness assertion…you say “though I had not wished sexual exercise to happen on this resort room, the barrister made it really feel so regular that I started to really feel perhaps it was regular and he actually preferred me” and that’s what you felt, the barrister preferred you in a sexual approach and as an individual?’

Individual 2 replied ‘sure’.

Studying from Individual 2’s private affect assertion, Williamson mentioned: ‘He kissed you and also you say “I used to be simply mendacity there with my mouth open and him kissing me. I used to be merely not responding”.’

Individual 2, who gave proof remotely and from behind a display screen, added: ‘I keep in mind being touched on my non-public components bare. I touched his non-public components in some unspecified time in the future. I used to be not smitten by it.’

She mentioned: ‘The respondent made it very regular, nearly as if this was a very regular factor to have occurred and for some time, for a protracted whereas, as I’ve maintained, [I thought] that I had been too pleasant and acquired myself in a scenario. However I made it clear I wished to go away the room. I mentioned many occasions I wished to go away then mentioned I’d sleep on the couch. I didn’t need sexual exercise to occur with him that night time.

‘I all the time knew what occurred that night time was mistaken, however I normalised it. I put the guilt on me. I used to be too pleasant and ended up in his resort room. I had a standard mentorship relationship with the respondent. I went again to the resort to work on arguments for the following day. I mentioned I wished to go away. I mentioned I wished to sleep on the couch.

‘He made it so regular. You begin to take a look at it and suppose it was not the best way I assumed it was. I acquired myself within the scenario, he has not achieved something mistaken when that isn’t the case. For ages…I put the disgrace on me, I ended up within the scenario as a result of I used to be too pleasant however that isn’t the case. I had nothing however knowledgeable relationship with him beforehand and I requested to go away after which not being let to go away, I mentioned I’d sleep on the couch after which after that [the] occasions occurred.

‘I didn’t need to have sexual exercise on that night time. It wasn’t till 2021 that my rose-tinted glasses nearly got here off.’

She mentioned: ‘If he had acquired up the following day and he mentioned “don’t say something, it’s essential to not talk about this” it might have, in my thoughts, mentioned that was one thing mistaken. We acquired up the following day, we had been in courtroom the following day, it was regular. We had dinner with different barristers, carried on with the week. It was utterly regular. He acted utterly regular with me.’

She informed the tribunal she might have ‘bodily’ left the resort room however felt unable to.

She mentioned: ‘If you’re in that place you don’t all the time understand how you’re going to react. I used to be alone in a metropolis I didn’t know, I didn’t reside in. I used to be alone with a person a lot older than me. He was my senior in occupation, he was a KC, I used to be a paralegal. He holds loads out when it comes to your careers, you have no idea the way you’re going to react in that scenario and I didn’t really feel I used to be in a position to depart that room.’

Sam Mercer, head of range & inclusion and company social accountability (together with Younger Bar and Employed Bar) on the Bar Council informed the tribunal it was the primary time there had been a number of complaints about one particular person by Discuss to Spot, a web-based device for these working on the bar to lift considerations about inappropriate behaviour.

She added: ‘We’ve got not been in a scenario earlier than the place stories to Discuss to Spot transferred their report back to BSB. It was new floor for us.’

The listening to continues.

Leave a Reply